Football, Hockey, MMA And Many More Sports


Novak Djokovic timeline: what did he say then and now about his positive Covid result?

Novak Djokovic has made an announcement he says will be his last before the Australian government chooses whether to re-drop his visa.

In it, the world No 1 male tennis player faulted his representative for a mistaken presentation about his pre-flight travel and recognized an “blunder of judgment” in intentionally going to an occasion while Covid-positive.

So what did we find out with regards to the timetable of Djokovic’s analysis and developments before his movement to Australia – and what are the issues still unanswered in the visa scratch-off adventure?

What did Djokovic say before appearance in Australia?
On 1 January, Djokovic’s representative presented an Australian travel statement for his sake, proclaiming “no” when inquired: “Have you voyaged or will you travel in the 14 days preceding your trip to Australia?”

Novak Djokovic
Novak Djokovic faults specialist for Australian desk work ‘botch’ and concedes not confining after certain Covid result
Understand more
Djokovic had gotten an exclusion to immunization prerequisites from the Tennis Australia boss clinical official, supported by a Victorian government free survey board, expressing that he had gotten a positive PCR test to Covid-19 “recorded on” 16 December.

What did Djokovic say in court records?
Djokovic’s testimony to the government circuit court testing his visa abrogation set out this course of events:

18 November – the Australian government conceded him a visa.
16 December – he “was tried and determined to have Sars-CoV-2”.
22 December – his second PCR test returned an adverse outcome.
1 January – he approved his representative to present his movement assertion.
2 January – he got a boundary authorization to travel from the Victorian government.
4 January – he flew from Spain to Melbourne by means of Dubai.
5 January 11.30pm – he showed up in Melbourne.
6 January – his visa was dropped.
What irregularities arose?
Gatekeeper Australia and others announced that Djokovic showed up at public occasions in the days after his 16 December test result notwithstanding Serbia’s guidelines requiring 14 days of self-segregation.

These incorporated a function for the disclosing of a stamp in his distinction in Belgrade, which he posted about on Twitter, and an occasion at the Tennis Association of Belgrade for an honor service on 17 December.

On 18 December, the French paper L’équipe said he partook in a meeting and its Champion of Champions grants photoshoot in Belgrade.

Djokovic was imagined in the city of Belgrade in a web-based media post dated 25 December, in obvious inconsistency of his revelation structure that expressed he had not gone in the fourteen days before his trip to Australia, which Australian Border Force started to examine.

What does Djokovic say now?
In Djokovic’s Instagram articulation on Wednesday he set out the accompanying course of events:

14 December – he went to a ball game in Belgrade after which it was accounted for that various individuals tried positive with Covid.
16 December – he took a fast antigen test which was negative and a PCR test.
17 December – he went to a tennis occasion in Belgrade to introduce grants to youngsters, in the wake of testing negative again on a quick test. “I was asymptomatic and felt better, and I had not gotten the warning of a good PCR test result until after that occasion,” Djokovic composed.
18 December – in spite of now realizing he had tried good, he went to his tennis focus in Belgrade to maintain a “long-standing responsibility for a L’Equipe meet” since he “felt obliged” to and “didn’t have any desire to let the writer down”.

While I returned home after the meeting to segregate for the necessary time frame, all things being equal, this was a blunder of judgment and I acknowledge that I ought to have rescheduled this responsibility,” Djokovic said.

What difference does it make?
Djokovic’s proclamation on Wednesday that he didn’t learn of his positive test result until after the occasion on 17 December follows his own assertion to the court that he was “tried and analyzed” on 16 December and Tennis Australia’s main clinical official’s letter that his positive outcome was “recorded on” 16 December.

Djokovic’s affirmation that his representative made an “managerial misstep” in “marking the wrong box” on his Australian travel announcement will arm the migration serve, Alex Hawke, with one more possible ground to drop his visa.

Hawke has the ability to drop the visa assuming he is fulfilled of a ground like this, or the first ground that an unvaccinated individual may represent a danger to general wellbeing, and that wiping out is in the public interest.

What hasn’t Djokovic clarified?
Djokovic’s articulation didn’t address a Der Spiegel report guaranteeing abnormalities in the evidently sure PCR trial of 16 December.

On Monday, Der Spiegel guaranteed that when it examined the QR code having a place with Djokovic’s PCR test at 1.19pm German time it said: “Experimental outcome Negative.” However after an hour, after another output, it said: “Positive.”

How Australia’s treatment of Djokovic uncovered its defective migration framework to the world
Understand more
On Tuesday, Der Spiegel said it had tracked down an inconsistency in the timestamp for the computerized variant of Djokovic’s positive test which, it guaranteed, showed the outcome may really be from 26 December and not 16 December. Spiegel recognized the timestamp could likewise reflect when the outcome was downloaded.

When gotten some information about Djokovic’s PCR test on Monday, his sibling Djordje demanded the whole interaction was public and “all archives are legitimate”.

Wednesday’s web-based media post likewise didn’t clarify why Djokovic didn’t wear a veil when he visited the youngsters while anticipating his PCR test result. He said he took a quick antigen test prior to going to the occasion “and it was negative” – apparently a bogus negative.

The Instagram explanation further didn’t address why he didn’t tell L’Equipe he was positive at the hour of the meeting and photoshoot.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *